Iraqi "breakthroughs" now broken right through

The reversal of the de-Baathification law actually made it more difficult on former Baathists, but that didn't stop Bush from taking credit for the "progress". Now the law to set up provincial elections has been vetoed, and Bush can't claim that as "progress" on his benchmarks.

Let's look at the Decider's own words, when he proposed the surge back on Jan. 10:

I've made it clear to the Prime Minister and Iraq's other leaders that America's commitment is not open-ended. If the Iraqi government does not follow through on its promises, it will lose the support of the American people
— and it will lose the support of the Iraqi people. Now is the time to act. The Prime Minister understands this. Here is what he told his people just last week: "The Baghdad security plan will not provide a safe haven for any outlaws, regardless of [their] sectarian or political affiliation."

These benchmarks were set by the Bush Administration back when the Decider was making public statements every day about all of the outstanding progress in Iraq and how corners were being turned and so forth. Soon after the 11/06 elections, however, the Decider turned into Grim Bush. Iraq was hard, it would take huge sacrifice, we needed a surge...blah, blah, blah. And even though Bush never specifically promised "success" by a particular date, it seems obvious that he expected great progress by September if the Iraqi government was to regain control of all of the provinces by November.

"To establish its authority, the Iraqi government plans to take responsibility for security in all of Iraq's provinces by November." (1/10/07)

Now more than a year has passed, and nobody expects the promise of the surge to be realised before Bush leaves office. The only thing left is for neocons to re-define "stability" as "whatever the situation is". The benchmarks won't be met, and the Pentagon will once again call the benchmarks "unreasonable", even though the Administration essentially wrote its own own test and failed.


story from McClatchy

Iraqi leaders veto law Bush administration hailed as political breakthrough

By Steve Lannen | McClatchy Newspapers

• Posted on Wednesday, February 27, 2008

BAGHDAD — Iraq's three-man presidency council Wednesday announced that it's vetoed legislation that U.S. officials two weeks ago hailed as significant political progress.
Also Wednesday, U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said he hoped that Turkey's incursion into northern Iraq to fight Kurdish rebels would last a "week or two" but "not months."
Turkish news agencies reported that as many as 77 guerrillas were killed the night before in the most violent night of the week-old incursion on Iraq's northern border. A rebel spokesman said fighters for the Kurdish Workers Party, known as the PKK, had killed 18 Turkish soldiers.
The rejected bill, which sets out the political structure for Iraq's provincial governments and establishes a basis for elections in October, was only the second of 18 U.S.-set political benchmarks that the war-torn nation needs to reach.
Parliament considered it in a bundle with two other bills, a general amnesty and a budget, and approved it on Feb. 12 in what was welcomed in Washington as an example of good government, compromise and progress toward national unity.
Now the question is whether parliament is willing to revise the measure.
"It was a package deal. Now that package is broken," said Joost Hiltermann, an Iraq expert at the International Crisis Group in Amman, Jordan.
At the heart of the rejection of the provincial law is the question of whether Iraq will have strong provincial governors who answer only to their elected executive councils or if the federal prime minister will have a voice in their appointment and removal.
The presidency council vetoed the bill, challenging the role it gave both the prime minister and the governor.
Anthony Cordesman, a Middle East expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C., said the law is needed to define the roles of Iraq's provinces and of the central government and to set ground rules for any future discussion of creating a federation of Sunni and Shiite Muslim and Kurdish regions.
"The key issue is whether the presidency council sent the law back for the right reasons and if parliament will improve the law rather than oppose further delays," he said.
A spokesman declined to say which member or members of the presidency council, which is composed of a Kurd, a Shiite and a Sunni, refused to sign the legislation, sending it back to parliament.
He said the Oct. 1 elections aren't compromised.
However, Hiltermann expressed doubt that the elections would take place as scheduled in October. "It's all up for grabs," he said. "Everything is set back."
Political groupings that oppose extreme government centralization, such as Sunnis, Shiite nationalists and Shiite followers of radical cleric Moqtada al Sadr, could see an uphill battle in parliament, Hiltermann said.
Hassan al Sneid, a Dawa Party member in the large Iraqi Alliance, supports the idea of a prime minister wielding control over governors. Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki is also a Dawa member.
"If the prime minister doesn't have the authority to depose a governor, we will have a president in each governorate," he said.