All the Republicans have left is treason

I thought it relevant to point out that the right-wing in the U.S. is now completely out of ammunition.

For at least three years, Bush has called those opposed to the occupation of Iraq traitors and supporters of terrorism. The "treason card" has been badly overplayed, as we see in the MoveOn controversy and the flag lapel pin controversy. It is literally all that they have left. The right-wing has failed to convince even marginal numbers of Americans to believe in the occupation's ever-shifting rationale; now they can only insult us.

And the lapdogs of the right-wing have gone further than Bush. Dissent itself is seen by them as dangerous to our freedom. Opponents of the occupation have been routinely characterised as mentally ill, stupid, opportunistic, and cowardly. It hardly takes effort to point out that Republicans live in a delusional world where "victory" has been imminent for years and where every setback merely "proves" that the "enemy" is on the ropes. Or that isolated facts are conflated to apply to the entire situation in Iraq by little more than force of will on their part. The mere statement of an objective by senior military commanders is seen by Republicans as the accomplishment of that objective. Mixon says that his goal is to clear Al-Qaeda out of Diyala -- there, it's done. He said so, didn't he? Contorted numbers are placed in front of Republicans and they are eagerly lapped up without a hint of critical thought involved, because this is somehow "patriotic". Reports of "insurgents" being killed are celebrated as if nobody will take these people's place, much less thinking just how these people were defined as "insurgents". And Republicans are not at all opportunistic; they merely make obscene profits from the war. As far as "cowardly" goes, it is clear that so many of the architects and spinners of this occupation have never served in the military or in combat. Clinton was apaprently a "draft dodger" by virtue of his student deferment, but the vast majority of the right-wing media tools did the same thing. It's okay, though, because they are "patriotic".

So, with no solid facts to persuade anyone with, they moved to scare tactics. If we don't "win" in Iraq, then we apparently will be taken over by Muslims and forced to bow to the East, wear burquas, etc. Nobody bought that, even a little bit. Vietnam and the domino theory were paraded around, but people just chuckled. Every now and then, the "Iraqis voted" talking point gets some play, and the Republicans are reminded that the Sunnis boycotted that vote, the provincial elections aren't happening, and that those wonderful elections got the Iraqis an impotent and incompetent government.

So they are back to treason, the Swiss Army knife of political discourse. Uh-huh. The vast majority of the American people are communists who want to see America destroyed and replaced by a Sharia state....that'll play well. Let's try that one. Sure, 70% of the electorate are dirty traitors, but if they only change their minds and support Bush on everything then they will immediately become wonderful patriots. All of that treason stuff will be forgotten. Come on, we'll be your friend. Oh, and accept Jesus as your Lord and Saviour, of course. Um, and we'll need more police state powers to protect you. But other than that, it's a win-win. Trust us, you commie dirtbags... uh, I mean loyal citizen. Did we mention you should really send your kids off to Iraq, just to prove we can trust you? Well, we meant to. But then we can all be friends, and you'd like that, wouldn't you? Hey, we'll even give you this flag lapel pin.

Aside from the ability to prevent Democrats from doing anything, all Republicans can do is keep stuffing the government with droids based on their religious beliefs and political donations. Even this will come to an end in January '09, and there will be a lot of incompetent sycophants trying to fill think tank jobs. It's a suicide pact between the President and his Party. And whatever allies we have left, of course. How could this plan possibly fail?

"Boots on the ground" extend a middle finger

Listen to the "boots on the ground", eh?

This quote from the article is the salient point:

"Some say two wars are being fought here: the one the enlisted men see, and the one that senior officers and politicians want the world to see."
Indeed. Guess which one the neocons see? Guess which side the "support-the-troops" warmongers come down on?

Every positive pronouncement from senior officers whose careers are on the line is treated as gospel truth by war supporters, and every critical remark from the "boots on the ground" is dismissed as "treason" and "traitor-talk". Soldiers who speak out are pilloried; officers who parrot the script they are given are extolled as heroes.

story from L.A. Times

GIs' morale dips as Iraq war drags on

With tours extended, multiple deployments and new tactics that put them in bare posts in greater danger, they feel leaders are out of touch with reality.

By Tina Susman, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
August 25, 2007

YOUSIFIYA, IRAQ -- In the dining hall of a U.S. Army post south of Baghdad, President Bush was on the wide-screen TV, giving a speech about the war in Iraq. The soldiers didn't look up from their chicken and mashed potatoes.

As military and political leaders prepare to deliver a progress report on the conflict to Congress next month, many soldiers are increasingly disdainful of the happy talk that they say commanders on the ground and White House officials are using in their discussions about the war.

And they're becoming vocal about their frustration over longer deployments and a taxing mission that keeps many living in dangerous and uncomfortably austere conditions. Some say two wars are being fought here: the one the enlisted men see, and the one that senior officers and politicians want the world to see.

"I don't see any progress. Just us getting killed," said Spc. Yvenson Tertulien, one of those in the dining hall in Yousifiya, 10 miles south of Baghdad, as Bush's speech aired last month. "I don't want to be here anymore."

Morale problems come as the Bush administration faces increasing pressure to begin a drawdown of troops.

<>

The signs of frustration and of flagging morale are unmistakable, including blunt comments, online rants and the findings of surveys on military morale and suicides.

Sometimes the signs are to be found even in latrines. In the stalls at Baghdad's Camp Liberty, someone had posted Army help cards listing "nine signs of suicide." On one card, seven of the boxes had been checked.

"This occupation, this money pit, this smorgasbord of superfluous aggression is getting more hopeless and dismal by the second," a soldier in Diyala province, north of Baghdad, wrote in an Aug. 7 post on his blog, www.armyofdude.blogspot.com.

"The only person I know who believed Iraq was improving was killed by a sniper in May," the blogger, identified only as Alex from Frisco, Texas, said in a separate e-mail.

The Army's suicide rate is at its highest in 23 years: 17.3 per 100,000 troops, compared with 12.4 per 100,000 in 2003, the first year of the war. Of the 99 suicides last year, 27 occurred in Iraq.

The latest in a series of mental health surveys of troops in Iraq, released in May, says 45% of the 1,320 soldiers interviewed ranked morale in their unit as low or very low. Seven percent ranked it high or very high.

In Yousifiya, troops occupy the sun-scorched grounds of a former potato-processing plant. They use pit latrines and get showers only when there is enough water. They jog around a shade-less concrete lot that serves as a helipad and mortar-launching site. Other troops in this area have far less comfortable surroundings.

Army Maj. Rob Griggs believes rough conditions are good for the mission. Without comforting distractions, troops are more driven to complete their jobs, said Griggs, who is on his fifth deployment, including two in Iraq, since enlisting 17 years ago.

"It allows them to focus on why they are here," said Griggs, who sleeps and lives in half of a 20-foot metal shipping container on the Yousifiya base. Having troops live in the same spare conditions as many Iraqis do also helps convince people that the Americans are genuine about wanting to make things better, he said.

But the disparities in living and working conditions among soldiers heighten resentments, chipping away at morale. So does the feeling that the mission is futile, a belief fueled by the Iraqi political stalemate and the unreliability of Iraqi forces.

"There are two different wars," said Staff Sgt. Donald Richard Harris, comparing his soldiers' views with those of commanders in distant bases. "It's a dead-end process, it seems like."

Asked to rank morale in his unit, Harris gave it a 4 on a 10-point scale. "Look at these guys. This is their downtime," he said, as young soldiers around him silently cleaned dust from their rifles at a battle position south of the capital. A fiery wind blasted through the small base, an abandoned home surrounded by sandbags and razor wire